Feedback #4 - research assessment

Well done, as a group you are working effectively to plan and research the production and are all working at approx a B/A grade level (15-16/20). You are very confident in your ideas when you discuss them verbally, however this is not translating to the blog which is the vital evidence for marking work. You are using it to “record” ideas – but not really explore your concept (Oli has provided some evidence of this in the group). General feedback to all three:

• Clear contribution of relevant focused research into similar products, with a progressive improvement in using using critical frameworks to inform analysis
• At this stage, time management very good
• Pitch very well presented verbally, however could have been improved in terms of use of ICT

Key points for securing A grade planning:

• EVERY POST MUST BE PROOFED FOR PUNCTUATION AND SPELLING FOR L4
• Improve layout of posts – use colour, subheadings, highlight key words/phrases. At the moment it is not demonstrating excellence in use of ICT
• storyboard sketches - take photos and upload to show progress towards animatic. Make sure your storyboarding process is improved from last year – more detail
• Not all the individual feedback comments I gave have been completed
• The actual Pitch post needs to have a clear list of all the areas covered in the prezi, so the moderator can see what it contains. Put slides on pitch evaluation post.
• Audience research results need to be clearly posted and evaluated
• Reccie photographs - VITAL
• Be more reflective and collaborative – for example the post on the drama studio reccie was very vague. You should have been discussing ON THE BLOG the ideas that came out of it